On September the 4th 1827, the greatest city of Finland was burned to the ground almost completely by the the biggest blaze that ever occurred in the Nordic Countries. Turku, former capital of the Finns, was devastated. How ? Why ? Many questions remain unanswered even today. Let's return to the catastrophe and seek the Truth about a tragedy that could have been avoided.
 |
| And here a map of the old town for a better understanding of the events. |
So we are in 1827. Since a few years already, the Russians that rule the land have transferred the capital of Finland from Turku to Helsinki, officially to get rid of the Swedish influence over Turku. But a few important institutions remained in the oldest city of Finland, like the Imperial Academy and such. Unfortunately, on September the 4th, things changed forever. Let's go through the
official version such as described on Wikipedia here.
A fire starts in a house at 9. pm and spreads to the North quarter, than to the South quarter, than... jumps over the river to conveniently put the church on fire... than the East, leaving only the western part and some of the South... OK... Seems perfectly logical.... or does it ?
The blaze seems to have spread very easily without any real firefighting. Where were the people ? Shopping in Tampere ! So as the biggest part of the inhabitants were buying new stuff to decorate their smoking hot living room, nobody seemed to be there anymore to extinguish the fire. Wait a second... The city suffered 30 fires in its history and they STILL did not have any plan for... OK, let's just accept this. So three quarters of the city destroyed, 11 000 homeless, and only 27 casualties and hundreds of wounded - most likely the ones trying to do something about the town burning. Again.
The biggest fire of the Nordic Countries makes 27 dead.
And 11 000 homeless.
Are they trying to make me believe that around 10 000 people were currently at Tampere's Market Place ?? AT 9 PM ??
I smell a rat. And what about the log of
Friedrich Wilhelm Argelander, half-German half-Finnish Observator at the Imperial Academy of Turku writing :
"Today observation was interrupted by a horrible fire that reduced Turku to ashes". Seriously, do you really believe that in such situation you would go :
 |
| "No shit was given that night." F.W. Argelander. |
"Dear Diary. Today was most annoying because the light pollution forced me to stop observing the sky and perform my duty. People in town are screaming something about the city burning to the ground, I think it's nonsense and intend to prepare some more tea."
No you wouldn't, and so he didn't. Because yes, this is of course what was officially released by the Russians after the so-called "investigation". The real log is far more insightful. Thanks to an anonymous informant at the National Museum in Helsinki, I had the honor of witnessing the real log, preserved by the Russians and saved by a brave Finnish historian from pogrom destruction during the 1918 Civil War as the museum was under siege (but that's another story). It goes like this :
"Dear Diary. Today was most annoying because the light pollution forced
me to stop observing the sky and perform my duty. People in town are
screaming something about the city being infested by flesh-eating ghouls, I think it's
nonsense and intend to prepare some more tea."
Now it makes sense ! The lack of official response, the panic of the inhabitants unable to try anything even though a RIVER flows in the middle of the town, the "absence" of many people, probably let's say, away to, hum... the Tampere Market ? Who's going to check anyway ! When you move the people and important infrastructures far away from the town, there is a word for this : Evacuation.
So what really happened in Turku in September 1827 ?
We know that the area is a big swamp that had suffered many ghoul infestations through time. 30 fires, that's not fortuitous. But if they had the experience, why did they fell ? Again ? The answer is simple : They stopped practicing. As Turku was being the center of the Church in Finland, Zombie Hunters were prosecuted and their teachings considered heresy and blasphemy. What should happen happened : They were unprepared. Let's go through their mistakes :
- Not recognizing a zombie outbreak : If it does not go down after you burn it, it's not alive anymore.
- Fighting with fire : The biggest mistake one could do while facing the undead is the use of fire. Nowadays, movies like to show off with Molotov cocktails and flame-throwers. But these are merely cleaning tools, no killing tools. Did the people of Turku believed they were fighting demons from Hell with holy fire ? Did they simply panic ? We will never know, but it was a bad, bad choice.
- Forgetting the double-tap : Some Zombie Hunting Historians have argued that the initial fire may have been cause while trying to get rid of the bodies, but without having double-tapped them. Outbreaks may at first look like a plague of some sort, and the people could have simply wanted to burned the deceased like they should. But without a good skull-crush, grand-pa probably made a unexpected yet spectacular raising from his pyre.
- Taking refuge in the Church : No. You don't take refuge in a church during an outbreak. You have no resources, no good way of defending yourself, you usually don't know all the entrances and exits, and every bitten dude will come here, thinking He may give a hand. This never happens, and infection spreads fast. The bright side, once the church is full of ghouls, it's easy to lock and put on fire. Oh, wait...
- Staying in the area despite constant outbreaks : After a while, when shit keeps happening, you may start to consider moving out, or at least, improve safety measures and defense against all odds you face again, and again, and again. A city that burns 30 times is a city that never learns.
- Going shopping in Tampere.
 |
| "Turku on fire !" : Official slogan. |
Consequently, the Russians did the call the Swedes should have done long ago. The capital was definitely moved closer to real soldiers garrisons (meaning Russia) instead of Sweden and things went better for Helsinki*.
Still, people argue nowadays that all this never happened, that it was just another demonstration of the maybe not-that-far-fetched reputation of Turku (which still brings a smile on Helsinki inhabitant's faces whenever the city is mentioned. Fortunately, as shown with their Turku Capital of Culture 2011 logo, they have humour. I guess this they really had to learn...). Other claim that it was a Russian plot to accelerate the moving of the capital to Helsinki, closer to their sphere of influence, teaching the Swedish lobby a lesson. But some of us have a more darker theory about this huge cover-up.
Where's the Truth ? You decide.
*Quote from Wikipedia : "Little came of the plans (nb : of the Swedes) as Helsinki remained a tiny town plagued by (...)
diseases. The plague of 1710 killed the greater part of the inhabitants of Helsinki. (...) it was not until Russia defeated Sweden in the Finnish War and annexed Finland as the autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland in 1809 that the town began to develop into a substantial city." If it was still necessary to prove the superiority of Russia against Sweden in Ghoul Hunting. Thank you who ? Thank you Ivan !
EDIT : And for those who appreciate the Turku Humour, this is how the tourism board of the city reacted to the reputation of Turku being the asshole of Finland :
EDIT 2 : And here is a less known theory about how it all started :